#

News

Closed-Loop Control in Solar Tracker Controllers

  • Page view:113
  • Author:GF
  • 2025-04-22

In solar tracking systems, the Solar Tracker Controller (TCU) serves as the central hub connecting sensors, drive motors, and communication platforms. Its role is not merely to “make panels follow the sun,” but rather to optimize angular adjustment through precise algorithms, thereby maximizing power output while minimizing operational costs. Among these algorithms, closed-loop control technology is particularly critical in modern, high-efficiency tracking systems.


1. Closed-Loop vs. Open-Loop Control: Fundamental Differences

Traditional open-loop systems rely solely on predefined sun-path models (such as SPA algorithms) for tracking, ignoring real-time weather, mechanical deviations, or structural misalignments. This often leads to discrepancies between the theoretical and actual tracking angles.

In contrast, a closed-loop system incorporates a real-time feedback mechanism. It uses data from light sensors, tilt sensors, or encoders to continuously monitor the actual panel position and irradiance, then compares it with the target position to correct any deviation—ensuring optimal tracking at all times.


2. Architecture of Closed-Loop Control in TCU

  1. Sensing Layer

    • Light sensors (LDR array): Detect the sun’s real-time position

    • Inclination sensors or rotary encoders: Provide actual panel angle feedback

    • Optional meteorological modules: Capture wind speed, temperature, and other environmental data

  2. Control Core (MCU / ARM-based chip)

    • High-performance microcontrollers execute PID algorithms, fuzzy logic, or adaptive control strategies

    • Analyze sensor data, compare actual vs. target positions, and calculate precise movement commands

    • Output PWM signals or CAN commands to actuators

  3. Actuation Layer

    • Interfaces with linear actuators, motors, or hydraulic drives to fine-tune panel angles

    • Supports settings for movement speed, permissible error margins, and soft limits


3. Performance and Advantages of Closed-Loop Control

Feature Open-Loop System Closed-Loop System
Energy Efficiency ±95% >98%
Tracking Accuracy ±5° <1°
Risk Response Passive Active (e.g., automatic stow during high wind)
Installation Tolerance Low High
Cost Lower Slightly higher, but faster ROI

Real-world cases have shown that a 500KW PV plant upgraded to closed-loop TCUs maintained a stable output curve even during partly cloudy conditions or low sun angles in winter, achieving a 3.2% annual increase in energy yield.


4. Communications and Intelligent Integration

Modern TCUs with closed-loop functionality typically support protocols such as RS485, CAN, Modbus, or LoRa, allowing integration with NCUs or EMS platforms for large-scale networking and remote monitoring. Benefits include:

  • Real-time status monitoring for each tracker

  • Remote commands for angle adjustment or emergency stow

  • Automatic alarms and diagnostics for abnormal conditions

Some advanced controllers also feature self-learning capabilities, which analyze long-term data to optimize correction curves and further improve tracking accuracy.


5. Deployment Across Different Tracker Types

Tracker Type Closed-Loop Strategy
Horizontal Single-Axis (HSAT) Light sensor + encoder feedback for east-west tracking
Tilted Single-Axis (TSAT) Requires gravity offset compensation in algorithm
Dual-Axis (AZ/EL) Dual-direction feedback, more complex but highly precise

Conclusion

The closed-loop control system in solar tracker controllers is evolving from traditional time-based or model-based logic to adaptive, intelligent, and redundant control architectures. For PV plants aiming at long-term stability and maximum energy yield, adopting closed-loop control is not just a technical upgrade—it is a strategic investment in performance, safety, and O&M efficiency.

 

CONTACT_________

Get in touch with us

We will reply to you within 24 hours.